Choice of the optimal mode of control of the process of emergency landing of an unmanned quadcopter

Fìz.-mat. model. ìnf. tehnol. 2021, 32:46-51

Authors

  • Bohdan Blahitko Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, vul. General Tarnavsky, 107, Lviv
  • Yuriy Mochulsky Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, vul. General Tarnavsky, 107, Lviv
  • Ihor Zayachuk Mathematical Modeling Center Ya. S. Pidstryhacha of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, vul. J. Dudayeva, 15, Lviv, 79005

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/fmmit2021.32.085

Keywords:

unmanned quadcopter, altimeter, proportional-differential regulator, management

Abstract

Peculiarities of the process of emergency landing of an unmanned quadcopter have been studied by mathematical modeling. The method of landing an unmanned quadcopter in case of failure of one of the four pairs of electric motor-propeller is proposed. The basis of this technique is the application of the parachuting effect. Parachuting is achieved by forcibly turning off the power of the motor, which is located at the opposite end of the same traverse as the faulty motor. As a result, the vertical speed of the unmanned quadcopter at the time of landing is significantly reduced and approaches a relatively safe value.

References
  1. Huang, H., Hoffmann, G. M., Waslander, S. L., Tomlin, C. J. (2009). Aerodynamics and control of autonomous quadrotor helicopters in aggressive maneuvering. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3277–3282.
    DOI doi.org/10.1109/robot.2009.5152561
  2. Wissiere, D. (2008). Experimental autonomous flight of a small-scaled helicopter using accurate dynamics model and low-cost sensors / David Wissiere, Pierse-Jean Bristeau, Alain Pierse Martin, Nikolas Petit. Proceeding of the 17th Word Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul Korea.
    DOI doi.org/10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.02480
  3. Nartin, P., Salaun, E. (2010). The True Role of Accelerometer Feedback in Quadrotor Control. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage.
    DOI doi.org/10.1109/robot.2010.5509980
  4. Becker, Marcelo, R.C.B.Sampaio, Bounabdallah, S., de Perrot, V., Siegwart, R. (2012). In-Flight Collision Avoidance Controller Based Only on OS4 Embedded Sensors.Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 34(3), 294–107.
    DOI doi.org/10.1590/s1678-58782012000300010
  5. Blahitko, B., Zayachuk, I., Mochulskyy, Yu. (2015). Matematychne modelyuvannya vplyvu osoblyvostey sensoriv na protses polʹotu bezpilotnoho kvadrokoptera. Fizyko-matematychne modelyuvannya ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi, 21, 22–29.
  6. Blahitko, B., Zayachuk, I., Kit, L., Mochulskyy, Yu. (2013). Modelyuvannya protsesu stabilizatsiyi ta kerovanosti bezpilotnoho kvadrokoptera u polʹoti. Fizyko-matematychne modelyuvannya ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi, 18, 21-31.
  7. Blahitko, B., Zayachuk, I., Mochulskyy, Yu. (2016). Modelyuvannya protsesu zletu ta pryzemlennya bezpilotnoho kvadrokoptera z pokhyloyi poverkhniv avtomatychnomu rezhymi polʹotu. Fizyko-matematychne modelyuvannya ta informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi, 24, 7-13.
  8. Mochulskyy, Y. U. (2004). Matlab u fizychnykh doslidzhennyakh: navch. - metod. posib. — Lviv: VTS LNU im. Ivana Franka.

Published

2021-07-06

How to Cite

Blahitko, B., Mochulsky, Y., & Zayachuk, I. (2021). Choice of the optimal mode of control of the process of emergency landing of an unmanned quadcopter: Fìz.-mat. model. ìnf. tehnol. 2021, 32:46-51. PHYSICO-MATHEMATICAL MODELLING AND INFORMATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, (32), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.15407/fmmit2021.32.085